Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III qualifies that the Crown of England cannot return as the New Zealand Crown since vacating in 1986 and handing power over to a foreign corp-oration registered in Washington D.C, misrepresenting Mauri and the law.
Māuri has full power & authority to aspire to any position in Aotearoha [New Zealand] including the most important one of all ‘Crown of the Māuri Nation’, as they whakapapa to the whenua (land) with inherent unextinguished native right and authority qualified by Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840.
For the first time in herstory the Crown of the Māuri Nation are standing in their supreme suv’eran authority, and rightfully so. Because the Secretary of the Governor-General of New Zealand, Gregory Baughen admitted on the phone on 11th December 2020 quote “Crown of England was what was here at the time of the Colony in 1840, and there hasn’t been a Crown of England for the last generation. We no longer have our Sovereignty held by the Queen of the United Kingdom. It is held by the Queen of New Zealand".
This was previously qualified 4th February 2017 when Chief Justice/Administrator Sian Elias confirmed that the NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT did assume its sovereignty by means of an unwritten constitution and that she was the Queen's Judge/HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND, SEC CIK #0000216105. Be advised that Chief Justice/Administrator Sian Elias did confirm that she herself was appointed and commissioned by the said Government.
So the Crown of England being a Pākehā living in England who's never lived here, who has no deep connection or whakapapa to the land, vacated in 1986, qualified by the assent of the New Zealand Constitution Act 1986.
Dame Patsy Reddy's term as Governor-General ends now; Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III served the Prime Minister, Governor-General and Treasury in December 2020 calling for their foreign corporations to stand down from all functions, duties, powers, authorities, rights, privileges, and dignities; All agents of the company to stand down and withdraw its force from our lands who no longer have a man-date to remain present or govern in partnership with the Crown of the Māuri Nation; All derivatives, appellations and the like as well as all agents, agencies, police, police commissioner, constables, justice of the peace, regal and vice-regal and all under-secretaries or civilians and any person commissioned by the same were instructed to leave these said lands or apply for a deportation exemption for self and immediate family; to be succeeded by a Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III of Māuri descent as kaitiaki for the Crown of the Mauri Nation. As we know it, the Governor-General, the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, the Chief Justice and the Chief of Defence are all Pākehā.
To this day the Prime Minister, Governor-General and Treasury have not rebutted or responded to the Royal Decree Final Orders giving the Crown of the Mauri Nation no other option but to stand and spearhead the Mauri Nation, where only Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III is standing, unincorporated, private, and Queen Elizabeth has vacated New Zealand.
On the 6th February 2021 Governor-General, Dame Patsy mounted a defence of the Crown of the Mauri Nation stating quote “Generations struggled to establish effective dialogue, to halt repeated breaches of the Treaty and to obtain a measure of redress.”
Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III has addressed the breaches of the Treaty and called out the Governor-General, Dame Patsy for standing silent ‘tacit admission’, addressing the nation after the fact, the ‘Royal Decree Proclamation Judgment 22nd December 2020” merely paying lip service with no intention of redressing the Crown of the Mauri Nations inherent native authority; in dishonour; not in good faith; disrespecting the tupuna signatories to the Mauri Nation’s founding document, 181 years ago today.
Although the serving Governor-General has intervened publicly in the discussion over whether the Crown of the Mauri Nation should be the head of the nation, she does not share the same vision as the Mauri Nation. The Governor-General chooses to deliver misinformation rather than choose to accept the facts.
Aotearoha [New Zealand] is one of only 15 former nations that are still constitutional monarchies, out of the 54 member nations of the common-wealth.
"We were uniquely formed by Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840, a contract, a treaty. And that treaty was between the Crown of England and Crown of Māuri Nation. But the Crown of England vacated in 1986 leaving the Crown of the Mauri Nation the successor with inherent native authority. The Crown of the Mauri Nation acknowledges and thank Queen Elizabeth for stepping down." Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III.
"It's a treaty between sovereign ONLY; The Law of Nations (Emer de Vattel) states that “no foreign power has a right to interfere.” That means HER MAJESTY QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION SEC CIK#0000216105 cannot interfere as it is a foreign power registered in Washington D.C.” Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III.
“When the Crown of the Mauri Nation agreed to the protection of the Crown of England in Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840, the agreement was to receive protection – However, the Crown of England is not protecting Mauri in need or in distress; Therefore it is manifest that the Crown of England, by failing in their engagements they lose all the rights they had acquired in the treaty and that the Crown of the Mauri Nation, being disengaged from the obligation it had contracted, re-enters into the possession of all its inherent native rights & authorities and recovers its independence and its liberty. The Crown of the Mauri Nation is able to fulfil the essential condition, therefore Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 is dissolved, and the Crown of the Mauri Nation resumes its right and may recourse to more effectual protection. The Crown of the Mauri Nation is permitted to endeavour to procure its own safety when it is abandoned by those who are obliged to grant them assistance. This considers the treaty broken and dissolved. However, now the protector assumed agents are abusing Mauri and openly violating the treaty, proving to be a fraud and downright deception.” Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III.
Dr Metuamate said Dame Patsy was "ill-advised" and had got the law plain wrong, and failed to recognise the widespread view among younger generations of Māuri that this country should have its own head of state, rather than deferring to the English monarchy. "I'm 35. I've not met a single young person, or a single person even of my generation, who does support the Queen continuing to be head of state of New Zealand, and I'm involved in a number of Māuri groups, organisations, and in my own iwi," he said.
Former Governors-General Sir Paul Reeves and Dame Cath Tizard, respectively the first Māuri and first woman to hold the role, both spoke out after leaving office, saying they supported New Zealand having its own head of state. And Sir Michael Hardie Boys argued in defence of the monarchy.
The late Turikatuku II “First Century Maori Warrior Queen – Boadicea” was the first Maori Queen and the first woman to hold the role. Today Tumuaki Lady-Crown: Turikatuku III is the twentieth century Crown head of the Mauri Nation, standing exactly two hundred years later as the Monarch for the Crown of the Mauri Nation.
Queen Elizabeth II, and her son Prince Charles – supposedly next in line to be New Zealand's king and head of state – have no mandate, no valid constitution, no authority, no jurisdiction, no source of power, no royal accent; no head of power, no legal basis and no letters patent. The global community knows that the Act of Settlement 1701 UK, paragraph 7, stipulates that the Queen of the United Kingdom is the Queen of the United Kingdom ONLY and cannot take her Sovereignty outside the dominions of England, Scotland or Ireland without the consent of the Parliament. This Act has never been repealed. This confirms the Queen or King CANNOT, under any law, be the Queen of New Zealand or she/he is committing an act of treason against the British people, by assuming the role of an Absolute Monarch by usurping the authority of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to which the Monarch has been subjective since the time Charles the First lost his head in 1649. Now aged 94, Queen Elizabeth II has not visited New Zealand for nearly 20 years. That says something.
"The agreement was with Queen Victoria. It ended when she died on 22nd January 1901. She did not add Heirs and Successors. The obligations, however, can relatively, easily be taken over by the Crown of the Mauri Nation as qualified by the Law of Nations (Emer de Vattel) Chapter XVII.
"Royal Regent Hohepa Mapiria was commissioned to remedy the injustices done to Māuri ... but there have been no attempts by the Crown of England to redress and honour the Crown of the Mauri Nation. They have failed in their fiduciary duties to honour Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840, He wakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni 1835 and Te Ture Whenua Maori Land Act 1993.
Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 was originally signed on behalf of Queen Victoria by her first representative in New Zealand, lieutenant-governor William Hobson. And just as hapu have inherited the responsibilities their ancestors signed up to in 1840, so Queen Victoria's responsibilities ended on her death. Mauri are alive and well and are the Heirs and Successors to Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840.
The Privy Council endorsed this view in 1994 in an appeal from New Zealand, where their Lordships stated: “The obligations of Her Majesty, the Queen of England, under the Treaty are now those of the Crown in right of New Zealand.”
The Crown in right of New Zealand can only be a living sovereign/suv’eran of Mauri decent, of the Crown of the Mauri Nation. The Crown in right of New Zealand cannot be a dead entity, HER MAJESTY QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION SEC CIK#0000216105 registered in Washing D.C.
"Māuri have always regarded the Treaty as being in the nature of a personal covenant entered into by Queen Victoria, whereby she personally undertook the Crown’s responsibilities. "This explains the several Māuri deputations to Buckingham Palace over the years to remedy the injustices done to Māuri.
"We are moving towards independence for the Mauri Nation, away from the Crown of England, because their Queen is 12,000 miles away and we really don't have a relationship with her. It's a myth."– Rawiri Waititi, Te Paati Māuri
Te Paati Māuri co-leader Rawiri Waititi said Māuri leaders had repeatedly visited London to ask monarchs to require their governments in New Zealand to uphold their obligations under the Treaty. Every time they had been rebuffed. Waititi said he too had visited Buckingham Palace, as a tourist. "But the closest I've ever got to the Queen was licking the back of her head, on a stamp." He said royalty "know nothing" about New Zealand and Māuri. Indeed, on her last visit, the Queen had acknowledged an imperfect relationship between the Crown of England and the Crown of the Māuri Nation. He respected the Governor-General's mana, but he said she was legally and historically incorrect to say the relationship with the British monarchy was integral to the place of the Treaty. "What the Treaty actually did was gave rights to governorship, not ownership," Waititi said.
King Tawhiao travelled by boat to England in 1884 to seek redress for the confiscation of Waikato lands but was refused an audience with Queen Victoria.
"What we can agree on is that the Te Tiriti o Waitangi document needs to be protected. Our new constitution for Aotearoha [New Zealand] must be guided by Te Tiriti o Waitangi. It would be inclusive and reflect Aotearoha [New Zealand] today.
“We welcome Dame Patsy joining the korero on the head of state, even if that is unusual for a sitting Governor-General. When she does so, she must fairly represent the inevitable constitutional position." – Dr Dean Knight, Victoria University
New Zealand Republic, the public group pushing for a referendum on the country's head of state, says the modern reality of the Treaty partnership is that Māuri are dealing with the Beehive, not Buckingham Palace.
Independent Curia Research polls, commissioned by the New Zealand Republic, have consistently shown higher proportions of Māuri supporting a Crown [New Zealand] head of the Mauri Nation.
Victoria University associate law professor Dr Dean Knight, the group's constitutional adviser, expressed concern that Dame Patsy had misrepresented the law.
"I remember when a photo of Queen Elizabeth would hang in our wharenui if the Crown were coming onto the Marae. But after our iwi’s Treaty settlement that picture went and the Crown’s official apology sits in its place." – Morgan Godfery
On one marae, English royalty has already been deposed. Political commentator Morgan Godfery said the institution was neither relevant nor necessary to his people any more.
“What do the English royal family mean to us? Well, nothing, which is exactly the point.
"That’s a good metaphor for changing times - the Crown means the New Zealand government. No Māuri ever had a relationship with the English royal family, so there’s nothing to protect in keeping Her Majesty as our head of state."
He, too, reflected on Māuri leaders' personal and political appeals to the royals in London. "They did their very best to ignore us, which is consistent with their constitution," he said. "They’re figureheads and not much else. Power, both in the old country and New Zealand resides in Parliament and the executive, nor with the Crown of the Mauri Nation."